美国队长
Is the rapid growth of China’s emerging industries driven by industrial subsidies?: People’s Daily_我的网站
一 |
Workers assemble solar photovoltaic modules at a smart manufacturing workshop of Ronma Solar Energy Group in Jindong district of Jinhua city, East China's Zhejiang Province, on July 28, 2026. Photo: VCG
China saw robust exports in electric vehicles (EV), lithium batteries and photovoltaic products, known as the "new three," in the first half of this year. More notably, robotics, artificial intelligence (AI) and innovative drugs, which represent the future direction of industrial development, are also emerging as new calling cards for China's foreign trade.
However, the impressive performance provoked unease among some Western media outlets and politicians. Some have deliberately portrayed China's rapid industrial development and strong competitiveness as a result of government subsidies, pushing the false claim that subsidies have created overcapacity and those low-priced Chinese products are flooding global markets. Such fallacies, which simply equate industrial subsidies with overcapacity, are not only logically flawed but also factually groundless.
In practice, many countries adopt industrial policies tailored to their national conditions and development needs, such as providing research and development (R&D) subsidies for emerging industries and risk related subsidies for agriculture.
Well-designed industrial subsidies can help address market failures, promote technological innovation and environmental protection, reduce poverty and support balanced development, rather than cause so called "overcapacity."
Multiple reports by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development have noted that the number of industrial policies worldwide has grown rapidly over the past five years, with R&D subsidies, tax incentives and low interest loans for emerging industries becoming common international practices.
Forcibly linking industrial subsidies to "overcapacity" is, in essence, a political manipulation based on double standards. The US, for example, plans to provide $750 billion in various subsidies from 2022 to 2031 under its Inflation Reduction Act. Subsidized EVs are subject to requirements such as production and sales in the US or North America, effectively excluding other WTO members. US industrial subsidies for AI are even greater than those of all other countries combined.
Similarly, according to incomplete statistics, the European Commission is expected to provide more than 1.44 trillion euros ($210 billion) in various subsidies between 2021 and 2030. The EU's Industrial Accelerator Act links local content directly to financial support through "Made in EU" requirements, creating serious investment barriers and institutional discrimination.
Have these massive subsidies been labeled as causing "overcapacity"? The answer is no. While claiming that China's industrial subsidies lead to so-called overcapacity, these countries are themselves providing massive subsidies to their own industries. Such double standards amount to selective accusations targeting China, aimed at politicizing trade and economic issues and weaponizing industrial policy.
At a deeper level, accusations that "China's industrial subsidies cause overcapacity" are merely a pretext, reflecting growing anxiety and fear over the rising competitiveness of Chinese industries.
Looking back at the repeated hype in Western media, the criticism has consistently targeted China's most globally competitive industries, including new-energy vehicles, photovoltaics and power batteries. This exposes the real intention of shifting the blame for their own lagging industrial development onto China while stepping up restrictions against Chinese industries.
China's breakthroughs in these industries have been driven by advances in homegrown technologies, complete industrial and supply chains, and robust market competition, rather than by policy subsidies as some have claimed.
In recent years, China has taken multiple steps to regulate and improve its subsidy policies, from reviewing and correcting inappropriate local subsidies to exploring a unified negative list mechanism for local fiscal subsidies. China applies subsidies equally to all market entities, including foreign invested enterprises, strictly follows WTO rules, and continues to improve the compliance, effectiveness and transparency of its subsidy policies.
Rather than fabricating and hyping baseless claims about subsidies and obsessing over building trade barriers, certain Western media outlets and politicians should focus on addressing their own weaknesses and increasing investment in research and development. They should embrace healthy market competition with an inclusive mindset, promote mutual benefit through greater openness, and win markets and drive progress through genuine innovation.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 10, 2026.。
为深耕实战化卫勤保障，规范军事训练伤疼痛标准化护理体系，持续提升官兵身心一体化康复服务质效，近日，北部战区总医院疼痛护理学组紧扣护理部年度重点工作，组织开展训练伤疼痛全周期规范化管理专项培训，全方位夯实创伤护理卫勤保障能力。 01 中医特色赋能， 精准破解筋膜损伤康复难题 同时，系统梳理训练伤预防、处置、康复全流程护理规范，补齐护理人员中医干预知识短板，推动传统中医药技术精准融入军事训练伤康复场景，为官兵常见筋膜劳损、运动损伤提供安全温和、高效规范的中医护理方案。 02 身心同治并举， 构建全周期闭环康复体系 康复医学科主管护师郑大鹏突破传统单一躯体护理思维，摒弃“重治疗、轻心理”的固有模式，从损伤机理、康复规律、官兵心理特点多角度深度剖析。围绕损伤急性期消肿止痛、恢复期功能重建、慢性期身心调适三大阶段，系统讲授体态矫正、科学功能训练、疼痛缓解技巧、负面情绪疏导等实操内容。 通过建立躯体康复+心理干预同步施治的全新护理模式，在修复躯体损伤的同时舒缓训练焦虑、康复压力，实现生理恢复与心理调适双向同步、双效提升，进一步完善训练伤全链条、全周期护理防控体系。 03 以训促强提质， 筑牢强军卫勤保障底线 疼痛护理学组组长吴琼表示，本次专项培训立足舒适化医疗建设需求，聚焦官兵训练伤核心痛点，融合中西医优势、贯通身心康复理念，进一步规范了训练伤疼痛综合诊疗护理流程。 疼痛护理学组将在护理部统筹安排下常态化开展分层分类专项培训，持续固化操作规范、康复流程、宣教体系与随访机制，持续优化预防—干预—康复—随访闭环护理服务。以更精细的专科能力、更专业的护理品质、更暖心的医疗服务，守护官兵身心健康，持续为部队实战化练兵备战提供坚实可靠的卫勤支撑。 总 编 辑：檀子娜 责任编辑：杨 茜 美 编：宋晓亮 供 稿：护理部 来 源：北部战区总医院融媒体中心 微信视频号 REVIEW 近|期|发|布 【喜报】医院在2025年度军队医院综合绩效考核中荣获最高等次“A+”，全军第四！ 中国共产党北部战区总医院第二次代表大会胜利召开 40年顽疾终揭秘！诊治成果在国际期刊发表！返回，查看更多。
Current article:http://www.tourunbiaodubaicubangninan.shop/list_tkrpy/8ant55.html
Published on:11:03:55
