侦探物语

“규백이 오라 그래” “깡패냐”…국군사관학교 공청회 욕설-고성 난무_我的网站

一 |     참석자들 단상 오르는 등 방해로 파행                   26일 오후 서울 용산구 국방컨벤션에서 열린 국군사관학교 창설 공청회에서 한 참석자가 발언하고 있는 김홍철 국방부 정책실장에게 생수병을 든 채 다가서고 있다. (공동취재) 2026.8.26 뉴스1국방부가 육해공군 사관학교를 통합하는 ‘국군사관학교’ 창설을 위해 마련한 첫 공청회가 사관학교 동문들의 거센 반발 속에 파행 직전까지 가는 등 4시간 내내 어수선하게 진행됐다. 일부 참석자들은 안규백 국방부 장관을 겨냥해 “규백이 오라 그래” 등 고성과 욕설을 쏟아내고 단상에 올라 진행을 막기도 했다.국방부가 26일 서울 용산구 국방컨벤션에 개최한 공청회는 시작 전부터 한 예비역이 단상에 올라 국방부의 정책 설명을 생략하라고 요구했고 이를 제지하는 과정에서 몸싸움과 고성이 오갔다. 방청석에선 “깡패들이 난장판을 부린다” “누가 깡패냐 이 OO아” 등 욕설까지 오갔다. 찬성 측 패널에게는 “정부 앞잡이”라는 야유가 쏟아졌다.각 군 사관생도를 포함한 300여 명이 참석한 공청회에선 전문가 찬반이 팽팽히 맞섰다. 찬성 측은 3군 통합교육을 통한 합동성 강화와 교육 경쟁력 제고, 규모의 경제를 통한 투자 확대 필요성을 강조했다. 반대 측은 각 군의 전문성과 정체성이 약화될 수 있는 데다 정부가 통합이라는 결론을 미리 정해놓고 충분한 검증과 공론화 없이 정책을 밀어붙이고 있다고 비판했다.국방부는 학령인구 감소와 미래전 대응, 합동성 강화 등을 통합 필요성으로 제시했다. 국방부는 이날 제기된 의견 등을 수렴해 9월 추가 공청회를 거쳐 10월 국군사관학교 창설 세부 계획을 발표할 예정이다.。    

    Shipping containers are loaded and unloaded onto ships at the Port of Los Angeles, California, on July 9, 2025. Photo: VCG
When even major US allies and trading partners are swept into Washington's alleged China-linked transshipment network, is the US still cracking down on its so-called illegal tariff evasion, or is it raising its "small yard, high fence" higher and tighten it further by wielding its tariff stick and extending tariff controls across normal global supply chains?
The White House on Thursday released a report identifying roughly 40 economies as participants in what it calls a "Shadow Transshipment Network", alleging that Chinese goods are being routed through third countries to evade higher US tariffs. The list stretches across Asia, Europe and the Americas and includes some of Washington's closest allies and largest trading partners.
Chinese experts said the report is partly aimed at defending Washington's tariff policy by shifting responsibility for its weakened impact onto other economies, while also pressuring them to follow US trade and origin rules. In effect, the US is trying to extend its unilateral trade restrictions beyond its own borders and deeper into global supply chains, they said.
Build 'higher fence'
The 25-page report claims that US import sourcing saw a "substantial reallocation" after the 2018 tariffs, as China's direct share declined and imports from identified transshipment economies rose. It alleges that some goods were routed through lower-tariff jurisdictions, where minor processing, relabeling, repackaging, re-invoicing or paperwork changes were used to create the appearance of a new national origin. 
However, the report itself acknowledges that alleged transshipment risks in several major economies are "embedded within broad legitimate trade flows." It also admitted that the post-2018 shift in US imports "does not establish" that all displaced Chinese trade was illegally transshipped and partly reflected "legitimate changes in production, investment, and sourcing."
False declarations of origin or simple repackaging can amount to tariff circumvention, but investing overseas, building factories abroad or sourcing components across borders are legitimate forms of supply-chain adjustment, experts said.
One purpose of the report is to portray Washington's tariff policy as effective while attributing its diminished impact to the responses of other economies, Zhou Mi, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the Global Times. 
This allows Washington to shift responsibility onto other economies and put itself in a more favorable position in shaping the narrative around its tariff policy, Zhou said.
Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics, told the Global Times that US rules for determining country of origin are not fully aligned with those used by other economies. The latest move could pressure other countries to adopt US standards, but Cui said such an approach is unlikely to work.
"Countries formulate their rules of origin based on a range of factors, including the scale and technological conditions of their own industries," Cui said. "Industrial structures and the global division of labor cannot be reshaped simply through pressure from one country."
Harmonization of rules of origin - applying the same rules across countries regardless of purpose - "would facilitate the flow of international trade," according to WTO on its website. 
It has also warned that misuse of such rules may turn them into "a trade policy instrument" rather than merely a device supporting other trade policy measures, according to WTO.
Washington was pursuing hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade sphere under the guise of "reciprocity", a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said when commenting on the US use of tariffs to pressure other countries into restricting economic and trade cooperation with China. 
Disrupting global supply chains

Cui said production and trade networks linking China with South Korea, Europe and other economies have taken shape over years of market-driven specialization. By lowering production and logistics costs and improving efficiency, these networks have benefited businesses and consumers across participating economies.
"The real challenge facing global trade today is not so-called illegal transshipment, but the continued damage that unilateralism and trade protectionism are inflicting on the multilateral trading system," Cui added.
Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made tariffs a centerpiece of its trade policy, rolling out sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" and other broad duties that have drawn widespread criticism at home and abroad. On Thursday, Washington announced new Section 232 tariffs on drones and their parts and components, further expanding the range of products subject to US tariffs.
US tariffs have themselves pushed companies to reconfigure supply chains. Washington is now citing those very adjustments as evidence of circumvention, effectively using the market fallout from its own tariff policy to justify further trade restrictions, Chinese experts noted.
International trade is based on mutual benefit, and sovereign countries have the legitimate right to conduct economic and trade cooperation independently, Cui said. "No country should interfere with normal global trade simply to advance its own unilateral interests."
The report broadens its scrutiny beyond routing and documentation to include China-origin inputs or components, Chinese ownership or financing, relationships with Chinese suppliers or manufacturers, China-based production steps and China-origin routing histories.
Analysts believed the latest move is more than simply making the existing "high fence" higher. By trying to bring more economies and a larger portion of global supply chains within the reach of US tariff enforcement, Washington attempted to make the "yard" itself much bigger.
Cui warned that sustained US pressure to reshape normal trade and supply-chain links could fragment mature regional production networks, and reduce the efficiency of global resource allocation, with the impact extending far beyond China-US trade given the wide range of economies named in the report.
Zhou noted that companies would be forced to redesign supply chains to manage rising policy risks, adding costs that could feed back into the US through higher inflation while creating broader frictions and instability for global trade.
。

Current article:http://www.tourunbiaodubaicubangninan.shop/list_8kq8441/dcg1wg.htm

Published on:16:07:57